S Seven Academy Tnpsc Salem

King Chandragupta I of the Gupta Empire ruled over northern India between the years 319 and 334 CE. He may have been the dynasty's first emperor, as suggested by his title Maharajadhiraja ("great king of kings"). The exact process by which he expanded his small hereditary kingdom into an empire is unknown, but a widely accepted hypothesis among contemporary historians holds that it was made possible by his union with Kumaradevi, a Licchavi princess, who served as a political ally. Samudragupta, their son, strengthened the Gupta empire much further.

Chandragupta I (319 AD to 334 AD) – Gupta Rulers

—

by

Tnpsc Salem
in , ,

King Chandragupta I of the Gupta Empire ruled over northern India between the years 319 and 334 CE. He may have been the dynasty’s first emperor, as suggested by his title Maharajadhiraja (“great king of kings”). The exact process by which he expanded his small hereditary kingdom into an empire is unknown, but a widely accepted hypothesis among contemporary historians holds that it was made possible by his union with Kumaradevi, a Licchavi princess, who served as a political ally. Samudragupta, their son, strengthened the Gupta empire much further.

Table of Contents

Chandragupta I - Background
Chandragupta I - Marriage to Kumaradevi
Chandragupta I - Impact of the Alliance
Chandragupta I - Extent of Kingdom
Chandragupta I - Coinage
Chandragupta I - Successors
Conclusion

Chandragupta I – Background

  • Chandragupta was the son of Gupta king Ghatotkacha and the grandson of Gupta, the founder of the dynasty, both of whom are referred to as Maharaja (“great king”) in the Allahabad Pillar inscription.
  • Chandragupta assumed the title Maharajadhiraja and issued gold coins, implying that he was the dynasty’s first imperial ruler.
  • Chandragupta ruled in the first quarter of the fourth century CE, but the precise period of his reign is unknown.
  • His assumption of the title Maharajadhiraja has led to speculation that he established the Gupta calendar era, with the epoch of this era marking his coronation.
  • Chandragupta I most likely reigned for a long time, as the Allahabad Pillar inscription indicates that he appointed his son as his successor, presumably after reaching old age. However, the precise duration of his reign is debatable.

Chandragupta I – Marriage to Kumaradevi

  • Chandragupta married Kumaradevi, a Lichchhavi princess. The name Licchavi refers to an ancient clan that was headquartered in Vaishali, present-day Bihar, during the time of Gautama Buddha.
  • In the first millennium CE, a Lichchhavi kingdom existed in modern-day Nepal. The identity of Kumaradevi’s Lichchhavi kingdom, on the other hand, is unknown.
  • According to an 8th-century inscription of Nepal’s Lichchhavi dynasty, their legendary ancestor Supushpa was born in the royal family of Pushpapura, that is, Pataliputra in Magadha. According to some historians, the Lichchhavis ruled Pataliputra during the reign of Samudragupta.
  • However, according to this inscription, Supushpa ruled 38 generations before the 5th-century king Manadeva, or centuries before Chandragupta’s reign.
  • As a result, even if the claim in this inscription is true, it cannot be taken as concrete evidence of Lichchhavi rule at Pataliputra during Chandragupta’s reign.
  • Kumaradevi’s Lichchhavi kingdom is unlikely to have been located in modern-day Nepal because Samudragupta mentions Nepala (that is, Nepal) as a distinct, subordinate kingdom in his Allahabad Pillar inscription.
  • Given the lack of other evidence, it is assumed that the Lichchhavis ruled at Vaishali during Chandragupta’s reign, as this is the only other base of the clan known from historical records.

Chandragupta I – Impact of the Alliance

  • The gold coins attributed to Chandragupta have portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi on them, as well as the legend Lichchhavayah (“the Lichchhavis”).
  • In the Gupta inscriptions, their son Samudragupta is referred to as Lichchhavi-dauhitra (“Lichchhavi daughter’s son”).
  • Except for Kumaradevi, these inscriptions do not mention the paternal family of the dynasty’s queens, implying that Kumaradevi’s marriage to Chandragupta was significant to the Gupta family.
  • It is also said that Chandragupta defeated the Lichchhavi kingdom, which was based in Vaishali, and that Kumaradevi married him as part of a peace treaty.
  • It suggested that the Guptas regarded this marriage as prestigious simply because of the Lichchhavis’ ancient lineage.
  • The Lichchhavis, on the other hand, are described as “unorthodox and impure” in the ancient text Manusamhita (vratya).
  • As a result, it is unlikely that the Guptas proudly mentioned Samudragupta’s Lichchhavi ancestry in order to boost their social standing.
  • Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Guptas allowed the Lichchhavis’ name to appear on the dynasty’s coins after defeating them.
  • It is more likely that the marriage assisted Chandragupta in expanding his political power and dominions, allowing him to assume the title Maharajadhiraja.
  • The appearance of the Lichchhavis’ name on coins is most likely symbolic of their contribution to the Gupta expansion of power.
  • Chandragupta was most likely the ruler of the Lichchhavi territories after his marriage.
  • Alternatively, the Gupta and Lichchhavi states may have united, with Chandragupta and Kumaradevi regarded as the sovereign rulers of their respective states until the reign of their son Samudragupta, who became the sole ruler of the united kingdom.

Chandragupta I – Extent of Kingdom

  • Other than his ancestry, marriage, and the expansion of Gupta power, which is evident from his title Maharajadhiraja, little is known about Chandragupta.
  • The size of Chandragupta’s kingdom is unknown, but it must have been much larger than that of the previous Gupta kings, as Chandragupta bore the title Maharajadhiraja.
  • Based on information from the Puranas and the Allahabad Pillar inscription issued by his son Samudragupta, modern historians have attempted to determine the extent of his kingdom.
  • Several kings were subjugated by Samudragupta, according to the Allahabad Pillar inscription. Several modern historians have attempted to determine the extent of the territory that he must have inherited from Chandragupta based on the identity of these kings.
  • For example, because the king of the northern Bengal region is not mentioned among the kings subjugated by Samudragupta, these historians speculate that northern Bengal was a part of Chandragupta’s kingdom.
  • However, such conclusions cannot be drawn with certainty because the identity of several of the kings subjected by Samudragupta is unknown.
  • Nonetheless, the information contained in the inscription can be used to identify territories that were not part of Chandragupta’s kingdom.
    • In the west, Chandragupta’s kingdom probably did not extend much beyond Prayaga (modern Prayagraj), as Samudragupta defeated the kings of present-day western Uttar Pradesh.
    • In the east, Chandragupta’s kingdom did not include southern Bengal, because the Allahabad Pillar inscription mentions Samatata as a frontier kingdom in that region. Furthermore, the Delhi Iron Pillar inscription suggests that the Vanga kingdom in that region was conquered by the later king Chandragupta II.
    • In the north, the Allahabad Pillar inscription mentions Nepala (modern-day Nepal) as a frontier kingdom.
    • In the south, Chandragupta’s kingdom did not include the Mahakoshal region of Central India, as Samudragupta defeated the kings of the forest region, which is associated with this region.

Chandragupta I – Coinage

  • Gold coins with portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi have been discovered in Uttar Pradesh at Mathura, Ayodhya, Lucknow, Sitapur, Tanda, Ghazipur, and Varanasi; Bayana, Rajasthan; and Hajipur, Bihar.
  • The obverse of these coins features portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi, along with their names in Gupta script. The reverse depicts a goddess seated on a lion, with the legend “Li-ccha-va-yah” (“the Lichchhavis”).
  • Various scholars believe that the gold coins bearing the portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi were issued by Samudragupta to commemorate his parents, while others believe that the coins were issued by Chandragupta himself or even by the Lichchhavis.
  • The identity of the woman depicted on the reverse of these coins is unknown. It is unlikely that she was a Gupta queen because the depiction of a female figure seated on a lion is typical of a goddess in Indian historical art.
  • Some historians believe the goddess is Durga. Although Durga is frequently depicted as seated on a lion, this is not a unique attribute to her: Lakshmi has also been depicted as seated on a lion.
  • For example, Hemadri’s works mention Simha-vahini (“having lion as her vahana”) Lakshmi, and images from Khajuraho depict Simha-vahini Gajalakshmi.
  • Some scholars believe the goddess depicted on the coins is Lakshmi, the goddess of fortune and the wife of Vishnu.
  • She may have appeared on coins as a symbol of the Guptas’ royal prosperity or as a symbol of their Vaishnavite affiliation, but this cannot be proven.
  • The goddess could also have been a tutelary goddess of the Lichchhavis, whose name appears beneath her image, but this cannot be proven.

Chandragupta I – Successors

  • According to the Allahabad Pillar inscription and the Eran stone inscription of Samudragupta, his father Chandragupta chose him as the next king.
  • According to the Allahabad Pillar inscription, Chandragupta appointed him to “protect the earth,” implying that Chandragupta renounced the throne in his old age and named his son as the next king.
  • The discovery of coins issued by a Gupta ruler named Kacha has sparked discussion about Chandragupta’s successor.
  • One theory holds that Kacha was another name for Samudragupta. Another theory holds that Kacha was Samudragupta’s elder brother who succeeded their father Chandragupta.

Conclusion

Chandragupta I was the most notable ruler of this dynasty. He united Guptas with the Lichchhavis by marriage. He extended his dynasty from Magdha to Prayaga and finally to Saketa. He expanded his domain from the Ganga to Prayaga. In 335 CE, Samudragupta succeeded his father, Chandragupta I, and ruled for about 45 years.

error: Content is protected !!